|
Dispelling the Myth of Home Rule: Local Power in Greater Boston
Newspaper
Articles
and Op-eds
Power
Plays in Massachusetts: Home
Rule is More Myth Than Reality by
David Barron, Gerald Frug
and Rick
Su from 2004 Annual
Report of the Taubman Center
for State and Local Government
Overruling
Home Rule by
David Barron, Gerald Frug and
Rick
Su from Commonwealth Magazine Winter
2004
Democracy:
A Messy Process by
Alan Lupo of The Boston Globe from The
Boston Globe 7/1/2004
Developers
Set Swift Pace in Planning Race by
Alan Lupo of The Boston Globe from The
Boston Globe 5/6/2004 |
The public forum to explore a new
study by the Rappaport Institute
by David Barron, Gerald Frug, and
Rick Su of Harvard Law School on
March 16, 2004 at the Boston Foundation
was a great success. Over 60 state
and local officials attended a
panel discussion that included
in addition to the authors, Professor
Barry Bluestone of Northeastern
University, former state senator
Patricia McGovern, Geoffrey Beckwith
of the Massachusetts and Robert
Ritchie of the Attorney General's
Office.
Home rule lurks behind every important
concern of Greater Boston. Local
policies on a wide variety of issues – finance
and management, land use, housing, and
education – depend on the state
grant of home rule.
|
| Paul Grogan at lectern introducing "Dispelling
the Myth of Home Rule." Panelists
from left to right, David Barron,
Rick Su, Barry Bluestone, Patricia
McGovern, Robert Ritchie, Geoff
Beckwith and Gerald Frug. |
But real local authority in Massachusetts
is restricted. Cities and towns have
little discretion over taxes, fees,
and borrowing, and only fragmented control
over their public schools. State government
imposes a number of unfunded mandates.
State law supersedes local law on all
issues, forcing localities to seek special
state legislation on matters of immediate
concern.
Based on interviews with local officials
in the 101 towns and cities that
make up Greater Boston, the study
by David
Barron, Gerald Frug, and Rick Su
argues one way to open up the possibilities
for regional policy is to take the
local
desire for home rule more seriously.
Panelists discussed the study's findings
and proposals for reform as well
as other ways that state law could
be changed
to enhance local authority for the
benefit of the region as a whole.
This important work provides a much-needed
blueprint to the most fundamental issue
of state and local governance in Massachusetts.
|