 |
Who Is That Masked Man?
Hi there. I would bet the man in the photo [Bulletin
Autumn 2002, page 80] is Gary Orren. He pulled this stunt in one
of our MPA classes in 1982/3.
Jane Burnes MPA 1983
Vancouver, British Columbia
Editors note:
Jane, youre correct! Gary Orren was the mystery Ronald Reagan
in the photo. Hes not a smoker though.
Soft Power
In the final days of the 2000 presidential election,
I expressed my concern about getting stuck with a not-too-smart
one in the White House in the increasingly unstable
world and equally volatile economy and social conflicts (Letters,
Bulletin Spring 2001). Two years into his incumbency, a good
man, who won the most important job on the globe, has come to a
crossroads of diplomacy, which may be well above his intellectual
capacity and concern. I submit that he
is about to miss an unprecedented opportunity for America, the only
and benevolent superpower, to lead the world into the new century
of vigilant peaceful coexistence.
In so speaking, I subscribe
to the use of soft power as Dean Joseph Nye advocates
(Executive Summary and Going It Alone? Bulletin
Spring 2002).
But, a foreign policy that takes into account
the views of others is clearly not in the vocabulary of the
Bush administration.
Contemptuous flexing of the decidedly overwhelming
military muscle by the cowboy president who has not
seen much of other parts of the world and by his equally one-note
advisors personifies the derided ugly American image.
At this writing (in February 2003), Bushs superpower U.S.A.
stands 4 to 10 in the U.N. Security Council on his war on
Iraq declamation.
It is worrisome when placards in
foreign lands say, We are not against America. We are against
Bush. That challenges our choice of leadership. Americas
undisputed superpower status calls for ever more intellectually
disciplined and astute practice of
|
 |
leadership in
the world. It is the soft power of the head of state,
commander-in-chief, leader of the free world, and our
president that we should choose and insure in the quadrennial election
of this free nation. It is indeed an unprecedented opportunity.
Thomas S. Momiyama SEF 1981
Silver Springs, Maryland
From Welfare to Working Poor
I read with keen interest the Bulletin article
Welfare to Work. In my work as executive director of
a large child and family mental health center in South-Central Los
Angeles, I see the articles themes played out on a daily basis.
Eight-five percent of those we serve receive TANF support and, thus,
are on the welfare-to-work trajectory. With histories of mental
illness, substance abuse, and/or domestic violence, our families
are those most in need of public assistance.
While some of our communitys
TANF enrollees are leaving welfare rolls, including mental health
clinic consumers, on balance they arent being lifted out of
poverty, but rather ascending to the ranks of the working
poor. This fact is documented in a recent City of Los Angeles study,
which found that among former welfare recipients employed five years
only 1 in 3 earned wages above the poverty level. Particularly concerning:
Of children and youth in South-Central, 46 percent continue to live
in poverty (compared to 29 percent for Los Angeles County).
Ultimately the measure
of welfare reform must be a measure of child well-being; namely,
are children made better off as a result of federal and state policy
initiatives? Studies undertaken in conjunction with welfare reform
have shown that children are made better off when family incomes
are raised. Armed with this knowledge, I would argue that we should
provide individually calibrated income supports to families
who enter the work force via welfare-to-work programs in order to
ensure that long-term employment and its benefits relative to child
well-being are sustained.
Elizabeth W. Pfromm MPA
1989
Los Angeles, California
Lets Hear from You
Read something in the Bulletin that made
you angry? Learn something new? Want to see more or less of something?
We want to hear what you think. Send comments and questions to publish@ksg.harvard.edu.
|
 |