| [http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/hauser/includes/topbar.htm] | ||
| [http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/hauser/includes/redbar.htm] | ||
|
|
Working Paper 22: Abstract
A Comparative Study of Inequality and Corruption
| |
|
We
argue that income inequality increases the level of corruption
through material and normative mechanisms. The
wealthy have both greater motivation and opportunity to engage in
corruption, while the poor are more vulnerable to extortion and less
able to monitor and hold the rich and powerful accountable as
inequality increases. Inequality also adversely affects peoples
social norms about corruption and beliefs about the legitimacy of
rules and institutions, and thereby makes it easier to tolerate
corruption as acceptable behavior. Our comparative analysis
of 129 countries utilizing two-staged least squares methods with a
variety of instrumental variables supports our hypotheses, using
different measures of corruption (the World Banks Control of
Corruption Index and the Transparency Internationals Corruption
Perceptions Index). The explanatory power of inequality is at least
as important as conventionally accepted causes of corruption such as
economic development. We also find a significant interaction effect
between inequality and democracy, and evidence that inequality
affects norms and perceptions about corruption, using the World
Values Survey data. Since corruption also contributes to income
inequality, societies often fall into vicious circles of inequality
and corruption. |
||
|
|
||
|
||
|
[http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/hauser/includes/copyright.htm]
| ||